Re: Switching to py.test
Robin Dunn <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.wxpython.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Chris Barker wrote: > nice! I'm a big py.test fan.... > > While py.test will happily run unittest tests, one of the nicest > things about it is that you can write far less verbose tests, and not > use that TestCAse.assertFoo nonsense! > > So as we move forward, maybe we can write cleaner, more compact tests. Yes, that is what I intend as well. It was nice to not have to make major changes to make use of py.test, but I agree that the extra features should be used moving forward where they make sense. > > Be sure to check out pytest.mark.parameterize() at some point :-) Will do. -- Robin Dunn Software Craftsman http://wxPython.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "wxPython-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.