Re: Opinions on name for PyPI

Using the name Phoenix has been useful to distinguish the new work in 
progress from the still-official Classic but as time goes by, post-release, 
the name will be less and less relevant. So I don't see much point in 
preserving it in *WxPython_Phoenix*.

The problem with keeping the name *WxPython* is that Googling for it at the 
moment brings up a pageful of links to the Classic version and, while this 
will gradually change as Phoenix predominates, there will likely be a 
mixture of both for the foreseeable future to confuse newcomers.

*wx* is indeed short and to the point but it isn't obviously a Python 
package outside of PyPI - so in the noble tradition of British compromise, 
how about *wxPy*?

Regards,
David Hughes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "wxPython-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.