Diff for wddx.py for comment and null support
m h <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.xml |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello all-
I just joined the list. I recently (today) had to parse WDDX in
python. In order to get it to work I had to patch wddx.py
accordingly:
197,198d196
< 'comment': (None, None),
< 'null': ('um_start_null', 'um_end_null'),
212,216d209
< def um_start_null(self, name, attr):
< pass
< def um_end_null(self, name):
< self.data_stack.append(None)
<
Don't know if anyone else is using wddx or even interested, but I
thought I'd share the diff.
matt
_______________________________________________
XML-SIG maillist - [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/xml-sig