Re: lxml 1.3 released
Stefan Behnel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.xml |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Gloria W wrote: > There's no chance of getting an extension to this module which supports > DOM2, is there? I cannot work with the current PyXML DOM2 support. It is > inflexible (does not allow subtree construction/insertion), is buggy, > and bloated. I wrote my own, but I don't have time to implement the > range() functionality. Let me know if there are plans to extend this. It > would be great. Ah, I forgot to say that lxml.etree is obviously flexible enough to support a DOM compatible implementation on top of itself. It's just that no-one has done it and it is unlikely that someone takes the time to actually do it. It would not add any functionality that isn't there already, just with a less pythonic API. In case you consider starting such a thing, here's how to do it: http://codespeak.net/lxml/element_classes.html Stefan _______________________________________________ XML-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/xml-sig