Re: Two bugs in catalog parsing
Maarten ter Huurne <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.xml |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OF7B68B0DD.9704A96E-ONC1257336.005A28BF-C1257336.005A6DFC@philips.com> |
Stefan Behnel <[email protected]> wrote on 2007-08-11 10:37:36 AM: > PyXML hasn't been actively maintained since the last release a few years ago, > so you'd be very lucky if someone comes up with a new release that fixes this. Thanks for the warning. > If you need that feature, feel free to check if lxml handles this asexpected. > It's based on libxml2, so it should follow the standard. It's also much easier > to use than PyXML. > > http://codespeak.net/lxml/ I am now switching to lxml and besides the fact that it is maintained, there is another advantage for me: lxml reports all validation problems in an error log, while PyXML would only report the first validation problem by raising an exception. Thanks! Bye, Maarten _______________________________________________ XML-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/xml-sig