Re: Replacement of tcl272
Eric Lopes <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:49:01 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.science.openeeg.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJupQ4cpV-OmPKZEg5pKHqd98oswDsch2QsMUd0HoSnfaFZO1g@mail.gmail.com> |
Thank you for the answer. It helped me a lot. Eric. Em 7h29 Qui, 27/08/2015, Stefan Jung <[email protected]> escreveu: > Hi Eric > > No you can't use a LM301, LM348, LM741, 324, 709, etc. That would be like > fitting a spoked, wooden rimmed, road wheel to a Porsche, it wouldn't > work. You might as well try an ECC83 - a dual triode valve, for those that > don't know. > > You need an opamp that: > > (1) is LOW NOISE (!!!!!) > > (2) Has a high input impedance, that means using some sort of FET-input > opamp. > > (3) Can run from a 5V supply. Most of Noah's Arc opamps can only run from > about 10-16 or so volts minimum. > > (4) Not so important, but you preferably want to use a low power opamp; > typically drawing not more than 1mA per opamp (just in case you want to > run from batteries). This means you will select a relatively slow (for > todays standard, not Noah's) opamp. > > Because you run at unity gain, offset voltages are not important in your > application. Rail-to-rail is also not a requirement. > > There are many newer and better devices than the TLC272, but if you can't > get a TLC272, I would just be wasting my time listing more modern (and > likely more expensive) devices. > > Regards > Stefan > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Openeeg-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openeeg-list > Go to the above address to change your > subscription options, e.g unsubscribe. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------