Re: 3D doubts
"Steven G. Johnson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.science.photonic-bands |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Vincent Paeder wrote: > I want to simulate a 3D slab of rods (see attached file rods-3d.ctl). I > started with the 2D case and supposed that, if the slab fills the cell > entirely in the z direction, I'd find the same band diagram as in 2D. > > However, I don't, and I don't either understand why. With increasing z, > one can see flat bands appearing here and there. > > I don't see for what kind of physical reason that may happen. Therefore, > I thought of groping around the following things: > 1) influence of the resolution for fixed z > 2) influence of the mesh size for fixed z > 3) influence of the cell size (in z) > 4) influence of the number of bands > > Nothing seems to help. Changing z is the only thing that really makes a > difference and it's the only thing that shouldn't. > > Now I'm running out of ideas. Does anybody have a clue? Your assumptions are incorrect. The 3d case *should* have additional bands compared to the 2d case. In two dimensions, you are only looking at light propagating in the plane (for kz = 0). When you include a finite cell size S in the z direction, then you are including out-of-plane wavevectors kz + 2*pi*n/S for all integers n, by the periodic boundary conditions. These out-of-plane wavevectors are what are giving you your additional states, which depend on S. This is not a numerical effect, it is a physical consequence of the question you are asking MPB to solve. You can think of this as the "folding" into the finite Brillouin zone of the vertical periodicity S (recall that MPB uses periodic boundary conditions). (In the 2d case where S=0 the Brillouin zone in the vertical direction is infinite and there is no folding.) Or, if you like, you can think of this in terms of higher-order "standing-wave" modes in the vertical direction. That is, the vertical mode profile need not be constant, it can be cos or sin of 2*pi*n/S for any n. See e.g. my paper in Phys. Rev B vol. 60, p. 5751 (1999) for further discussion of the consequences of slab thickness. Or some of my tutorial presentations at ab-initio.mit.edu/photons/tutorial Cordially, Steven G. Johnson