Re: mpb-mpi speedup vs. serial mpb

"Steven G. Johnson" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.science.photonic-bands
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, nate lipkowitz wrote:
> which is pretty bad linearity with respect to the number of processors 
> involved. however this is also a pretty small job.  is this normal for 
> mpb-mpi calculations involving small jobs?  can i expect an improvement 
> with larger jobs, or should i dig into locally-specific issues like 
> interconnects or scheduling priorities and whatnot?

Yes, you should get more of an improvement with larger jobs.  Generally, I 
only use mpb-mpi for very large calculations, especially defect mode 
calculations.

If you want to parallelize small calculations you should look into 
mpb-split, which runs the different k points in parallel (see the manual).

Steven
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.