Re: Point defects in slab structure - resonant frequencies

Rob <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.science.photonic-bands
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Steven,
Thank you for the help.  I had a few other quick things I am having trouble with:

1. I added statements for compute-energy-in-objects, but found most of the
percentages were low (the highest was 15%).  When I looked at the Hz field
patterns (I am using a hexagaonal lattice of air holes in Si, r/a = 0.3, h/a =
0.6) at z=0 output using h5topng expanded for a couple of periods, I do not see
field localization in the center defect, but do see field localization in the
expanded periodic copies of the defect.  Please see:
http://img235.imageshack.us/img235/8948/b75ap1.jpg
Is there a physical reason why the periodic copies of the supercell and its
defect seem to have field localization, but not the center one?  Does this
explain why my compute-energy-in-objects percentages are low for a cylinder
object placed at the center of the simulation area?

2. For a 2D point defect, the resonant frequency should be equal at all k
points.  Should this hold for slab structures?  When I plot all of the bands in
the gap at once for a slab structure, one can visually see flat bands, but when
I plot individual bands, the frequencies seem to vary with k.  

I really appreciate the help given to questions such as this and for MPB and
MEEP in general.  
Thank you
Rob
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.