Re: Point defects in slab structure - resonant frequencies
Rob <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.science.photonic-bands |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Steven, Thank you for the help. I had a few other quick things I am having trouble with: 1. I added statements for compute-energy-in-objects, but found most of the percentages were low (the highest was 15%). When I looked at the Hz field patterns (I am using a hexagaonal lattice of air holes in Si, r/a = 0.3, h/a = 0.6) at z=0 output using h5topng expanded for a couple of periods, I do not see field localization in the center defect, but do see field localization in the expanded periodic copies of the defect. Please see: http://img235.imageshack.us/img235/8948/b75ap1.jpg Is there a physical reason why the periodic copies of the supercell and its defect seem to have field localization, but not the center one? Does this explain why my compute-energy-in-objects percentages are low for a cylinder object placed at the center of the simulation area? 2. For a 2D point defect, the resonant frequency should be equal at all k points. Should this hold for slab structures? When I plot all of the bands in the gap at once for a slab structure, one can visually see flat bands, but when I plot individual bands, the frequencies seem to vary with k. I really appreciate the help given to questions such as this and for MPB and MEEP in general. Thank you Rob