why the simulation result vary with the size of the geometry?

Hassan Aghababaeian <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.science.photonic-bands
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Dear MPB Users

When I simulate Band Gap in triangular PC, the result is different for different size of the geometry.
e.g. in simple following ctl file, when I set L=7 or L=1, the gap diagram is different but Epsilon.png files are similar after using mpb-data -r -x -7 -y -1 -n 64 epsilon.h5 for one with L=1;

 
I think  if we repeat one single row of the holes in geometry or
                   repeat  one block of holes (including 7 rows) the result should be same.
why the simulation result vary with the size of the geometry?

My be I don't have good understanding about meaning of size in definition of geometry or not fully understand of 
mpb-data -r -x -7 -y -1 -n 64 epsilon.h5


Please help.

Regards
Hassan
================================
(define L 1); or 7
(set! default-material (make dielectric (epsilon 12)))
(define Gamma' (vector3 0.2 0 0))
(define K' (lattice->reciprocal (vector3 0.5 0 0))) ; edge of Brillouin zone.
(set! k-points (interpolate 4 (list Gamma' K')))
(set! num-bands 9)
(set-param! resolution 32)

(set! geometry-lattice (make lattice 
             (basis1 (/ (sqrt 3) 2) 0.5)
             (basis2 (/ (sqrt 3) 2) -0.5)
             (size L 7 no-size)))
(set! geometry (list (make cylinder
               (center 0 0 0) (radius r) (height infinity)
            (material air))))
(set! geometry (geometric-objects-lattice-duplicates geometry) )
(run-te)
=======================================

_______________________________________________
mpb-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mpb-discuss
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.