Re: [TYPES] Meaning explanations and the invalidity of the law of excluded middle

Andrej Bauer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.science.types
Message-ID <CAB0nkh3+SKNoir-Qj+Txq+H-YaQ0djk3Kdfi3kqozHwxW1+Smg@mail.gmail.com> 
[ The Types Forum, http://lists.seas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/types-list ]

Perhaps it helps to solve the following simpler exercise first:

Is there a term

G : (nat → nat) → nat

such that, for any closed term f : nat → nat, G f is a Gödel code of f ?

With kind regards,

Andrej
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.