Re: [TYPES] Writing syntactic models with "full information"

Andreas Nuyts <[email protected]> Mon, 23 May 2022 18:17:22 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.science.types
Message-ID <[email protected]>
[ The Types Forum, http://lists.seas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/types-list ]

I guess that is a justification to presume in one's head that context 
and type can be uniquely inferred by the reader :-)

On 23.05.22 17:39, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> I do tend to presume in my head that my terms are intrinsically typed,