Re: [TYPES] What is the term after reduction called?
Fritz Henglein <fritz-IzpjTRc13oxWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> Sat, 11 Jun 2022 11:09:30 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.science.types |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAD73y9kyGHA5dDUCbE2pMet1bQ_6Z87zB3cpTq7kGaxBgFdCvA@mail.gmail.com> |
[ The Types Forum, http://lists.seas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/types-list ] Commonly 'reduct' is used, which is English and derived from the Latin 'reductum'. But since Latin is arguably a conditio sine qua non of erudite discourse, 'reductum' is clearly an option. (Writing the remainder of one's paper in Latin may be a challenge and not an H-index friendly strategy, though. It hasn't been done much since Gauss's Disquisitiones Arithmeticae.) On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 2:38 PM Fangyi Zhou <fangyi.zhou15-AQ/[email protected]> wrote: > [ The Types Forum, http://lists.seas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/types-list > ] > > Dear TYPES mailing list > > Let M -> N. > > It appears to me that the terminology for terms before reduction (M) is > sometimes called a reducible expression (redex), although the concept of > redex > seems to be more general than that. > > Is there an agreed terminology for the term after reduction (N)? > The wikipedia page for lambda calculus (without giving any sources) calls > the > expression to which a redex reduces to a 'reduct', but I've seen other > words > used such as 'reductum'. > > Apologies if the question is silly. > > Best, > Fangyi > > -- > Fangyi Zhou (Pronouns: they/them) > PhD Student > Mobility Reading Group > Department of Computing > Imperial College London > >