Re: [TYPES] What is the term after reduction called?
"William J. Bowman" <wjb-r2/fXjr+/[email protected]> Thu, 9 Jun 2022 10:19:43 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.science.types |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[ The Types Forum, http://lists.seas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/types-list ] I've seen "reduct", but also "contractum". See e.g. "Semantics Engineering with PLT Redex". As with much terminology and notation, I doubt you will find one true answer. -- William J. Bowman On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 01:31:33PM +0100, Fangyi Zhou wrote: > [ The Types Forum, http://lists.seas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/types-list ] > > Dear TYPES mailing list > > Let M -> N. > > It appears to me that the terminology for terms before reduction (M) is > sometimes called a reducible expression (redex), although the concept of redex > seems to be more general than that. > > Is there an agreed terminology for the term after reduction (N)? > The wikipedia page for lambda calculus (without giving any sources) calls the > expression to which a redex reduces to a 'reduct', but I've seen other words > used such as 'reductum'. > > Apologies if the question is silly. > > Best, > Fangyi > > -- > Fangyi Zhou (Pronouns: they/them) > PhD Student > Mobility Reading Group > Department of Computing > Imperial College London >