Re: RFE for scigraphica
"Adrian E. Feiguin" <[email protected]> Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:25:55 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.scigraphica.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I just realized that the ticks properties are set in the "frame" dialog. Do you think we need to set the tick properties for each axis individually? Saludos, <ADRIAN> Parrenin Frederic wrote: >>Xmgrace can do really nice stuff, but I share your view it's not easy >>to use well. Also look at dislin. >> >> > >I agree that xmgrace can do nice stuff, the final result is good, and it >is why I use it. I have given a look at dislin, but it is only a set >libraries, isn't it? No gui to create a graph, so for me it is not an >option. > >On the other hand, there are irritating limitations in xmgrace: >- the i/o of data is really rustic. No copy/paste from/to other >applications. Importing data sets is a nightmare. >- you cannot insert images >- you have to define the size of your graph before starting, and it is >not easy to change after. And the zoom is linked to the size of the >graph (it is going to change in the next version I think) >- XY graphs cannot share the X (or Y) axis >- the sets are attached to a graph, and that is a bad concept. A set is >a content, a graph is only a representation of this set. We should be >able to show the same set in different graphs. In Scigraphica, there is >a clear distinction between data sets and plots. >- not sure the "XY set" concept of xmgrace is the right paradigm. I >prefer the way it is done in Scigraphica: the smallest object is a >column, and you can plot XY or XYZ or whatever charts from these >columns. >- you only have one sheet per xmgrace experiment file >- you cannot easily select and move the objects in the sheet (title, >axis title, text object, legend, ...) >- the UI is archaic, it really needs to be ported to GTK. >- there are almost no 3D possibilities > >These limitations are deep and it would require to rewrite a large part >of the software. And the author does not seem to be open to deep >changes, so for me it is a dead project in the long run. >I put more hope in Scigraphica that is constructed on a robust basis, >but the project will have to change its management and marketing >aspects. > > Frédéric > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl