Re: Branch development? ...Does anyone care about the user??

 Having all the IO functionality in
plugins it's gonna make it easier for everybody to improve and enhance the
code, as well as adding new features. I'm almost there. I have to prepare
a talk for tomorrow, but I'll try to post the code at the end of the week.
The plugin system is what's going to make SG really a killer app, I hope
;-)
 I thank you all for the interest in contributing to the project, I'm
really very aware of that, and that it's you who are going to make SG
really a great program and tool. I just want to settle the basic code for
everybody to work on a common basis. I just ask you for a couple of days
and some patience. (Especially to Rob ;-)
 I've got the library ready, and practically decoupled from the main core
code of sg, except for some Python silly stuff. I also need to implement
the g_module interface to read the plugins dynamically but that we'll take
me only a couple of hours of work. 
 Saludos,
 <ADRIAN>

On 15 Apr 2003, bryan cole wrote:

> If there is still a substantial period of development required before
> Adrian's "New Improved SG" becomes testable/useable, how about a formal
> branch in CVS to allow bug-fixing and stability-improvments in the
> SG-0.8 version?
> 
> SG-0.8 was 99% of the way towards being a killer plotting application on
> linux. Unfortunately, a few small-but-significant bugs prevent it's
> production-use (e.g. the loss of imported ascii-data with the wrong
> (windows style) line-terminator, memory-leaks, bad scrolling/zooming
> ...). I started fixing a few things and writting plug-ins after 0.8 was
> released but gave up once I could no longer compile from CVS.
> 
> Last time I could compile SG from CVS was about Jan/Feb. 2002. I'm not
> sufficiently experienced with all GNU automake/autoconfigure stuff to
> understand the build problems. 
> 
> Bryan
> 
> On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 23:45, Blake S Simpkins wrote:
> > I'm not trying to start a flame but why doesn't anyone seem to give a hoot
> > about helping this user get scigraphica up and running.  If the answer is
> > too obvious for you to give to me, please tell me I'm a dumbass and that
> > the answer is obvious (only one email is necessary).
> > 
> > Maybe developers are less concerned with the users and more concerned with
> > developing for developing's sake.  Anyway, I've been spending a lot of
> > time searching the web and working to get scigraphica running.  I've
> > overcome several problems on my own but am stuck on a gtk+extra obstacle.
> > Please help me.  If you really don't care or have the time to help a user
> > get SG installed, please tell me and I'll quit bothering the list.
> > 
> > My problem is described below.
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Scigraphica-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scigraphica-devel
> 



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf