Re: Problems with new plot widget

Sorry, sorry, I didn't read your mail carefully. Actually, I replced 
those values in testgtkplot.c in gtkextra-1.0.0, and everything works as 
expected. Try it out, and see if you can reproduce it using testgtkplot. 
I'm guessing that you may be using the wrong arguments.
Saludos,
<ADRIAN>

John Gotts wrote:

>Was the API changed from 0.99.16?
>
>I'm setting the ticks with args 10.40, 0.00 and 93727.62, 0.00
>
>John
>
>In message <[email protected]>, "Adrian E. Feiguin" writes:
>
>  
>
>>Hi John,
>>
>>All you have to do is set the tick space and the number of minor ticks 
>>using gtk_plot_set_ticks, setting the range won't set the tick intervals 
>>automatically. Good luck.
>>
>>Saludos,
>><ADRIAN>
>>
>>John Gotts wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>I've ported our program to use the new 1.0.0 plot widget but there appears to
>>>be problems with the x axis.  First of all, here is the graph, a simple line
>>>graph with a couple dozen points:
>>>
>>>Profit and loss graph: (498.000000, 147732.725344) (499.000000, 159540.962061
>>>      
>>>
>>) (500.000000, 171349.198779) (501.000000, 183157.825496) (502.000000, 194966.
>>062214) (503.000000, 203894.438931) (504.000000, 194368.465649) (505.000000, 1
>>84838.992366) (506.000000, 175309.519084) (507.000000, 165783.545802) (508.000
>>000, 156254.072519) (509.000000, 146724.599237) (510.000000, 137195.125954) (5
>>11.000000, 127436.712672) (512.000000, 117632.799389) (513.000000, 107832.4261
>>07) (514.000000, 98028.512824) (515.000000, 88224.599542) (516.000000, 78424.2
>>26260) (517.000000, 68620.312977) (518.000000, 58816.399695) (519.000000, 4901
>>6.026412) (520.000000, 39212.113130) (521.000000, 29408.199847) (522.000000, 1
>>9604.286565) (523.000000, 9803.913282) (524.000000, 0.000000) (525.000000, -98
>>78.353282) (526.000000, -19953.126565) (527.000000, -30031.479847) (528.000000
>>, -40109.833130) (529.000000, -50188.186412) (530.000000, -60262.959695) (531.
>>000000, -70341.312977) (532.000000, -80419.666260) (53!
>>    
>>
>>>3.000000, -90494.439542) (534.000000, -100572.792824) (535.000000, -110651.1
>>>      
>>>
>>46107) (536.000000, -120725.919389) (537.000000, -130804.272672) (538.000000, 
>>-140879.045954) (539.000000, -150957.399237) (540.000000, -161226.592519) (541
>>.000000, -171579.385802) (542.000000, -181928.559084) (543.000000, -192281.352
>>366) (544.000000, -202634.145649) (545.000000, -212983.318931) (546.000000, -2
>>23336.112214) (547.000000, -233688.905496) (548.000000, -244038.078779) (549.0
>>00000, -254390.872061) (550.000000, -264743.665344)
>>    
>>
>>>I set the range using these values:
>>>
>>>Range: 492.80 555.20 -311607.48 250758.25
>>>
>>>Then I set the ticks using these values:
>>>
>>>Set ticks for GTK_PLOT_AXIS_X: 10.40, 0
>>>Set ticks for GTK_PLOT_AXIS_Y: 93727.62, 0
>>>
>>>The result:
>>>
>>>http://linuxsavvy.com/plot-tick-bug.jpg
>>>
>>>The widget is drawing a ridiculous number of ticks for the x axis, and the
>>>graph takes several minutes to render on my 2 GHz Athlon processor.  0.99.16
>>>is so fast you can't measure wall clock time.
>>>
>>>All of these values worked fine with 0.99.16.
>>>
>>>Just for grins, I tried the [new?] autoscale API, which doesn't work right
>>>for the x axis, either:
>>>
>>>http://linuxsavvy.com/autoscale-glitch.jpg
>>>
>>>But autoscale doesn't really suit us, as we need the finer-grained control
>>>that version 0.99.16 of the plot widget allowed us to have.
>>>
>>>I don't want to name names, I suspect these fixes were at fault:
>>>
>>>+- Eric Monsler <[email protected]>
>>>+  Fixes for autoscaling.
>>>
>>>John
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>    
>>
>
>  
>



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl