Re: missing conjugations in french

Martin Porter <[email protected]> Thu, 19 Dec 2024 16:41:17 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.search.snowball
Message-ID <CA+s0XwWo1y=jt7mPNY8napgQYaBd0Y3iBWT06WKsE98NXkXzcw@mail.gmail.com>
--===============9063946197239890573==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b72dd80629a23361"

--000000000000b72dd80629a23361
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

The choice of endings here was carefully considered in the initial design.
If you remove -ons because it is a 1st person plual present indicative verb
ending, it will also remove -ons when it is the plural form of one of the
numerous class of French nouns ending -on. Then cochon / cochons stem
differently etc. Simolar remarks apply to the other endings.

If a new ending is added, you have to look at all the changes made in a
large sample vocabulary. There will be gains and losses and you have to
balance the two.

--000000000000b72dd80629a23361
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>The choice of endings here was carefully considered i=
n the initial design. If you remove -ons because it is a 1st person plual p=
resent indicative verb ending, it will also remove -ons when it is the plur=
al form of one of the numerous class of French nouns ending -on. Then cocho=
n / cochons stem differently etc. Simolar remarks apply to the other ending=
s.</div><div><br></div><div>If a new ending is added, you have to look at a=
ll the changes made in a large sample vocabulary. There will be gains and l=
osses and you have to balance the two.<br></div></div>

--000000000000b72dd80629a23361--


--===============9063946197239890573==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Snowball-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tartarus.org/mailman/listinfo/snowball-discuss

--===============9063946197239890573==--