Re: Weighting Schemes: Evaluation results

Parth Gupta <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.search.xapian.devel
Message-ID <CAMsucs10UcH3QsgKFkgWiXgoqeGEQ76+3NmfrzknNmqMVjvD4w@mail.gmail.com>
Ah. If FIRE doesn't have something that can show this suitably, then
> maybe Parth can advise on access to TREC, as I know he's used some of
> them in the past.
>


​I can say FIRE is also a reliable source but INEX/TREC are better. INEX
can give you free access and TREC is not freely available. I had used INEX
for xapian in the past and some details are here:
https://trac.xapian.org/wiki/GSoC2011/LTR/Notes#IREvaluationofLetorrankingscheme

I roughly remember that there was a discussion with our this year GSOC
student Ayush about INEX data. He had also obtained it, this would also be
a good way to collaborate with him :) and try to establish a common
evaluation dataset for future.

Cheers
Parth

>
> Certainly until we have something where evaluation shows an
> improvement, we shouldn't change the default. It does sound like it
> should be possible to find a suitable dataset to demonstrate this on,
> though.
>
> J
>
> --
>   James Aylett, occasional trouble-maker
>   xapian.org
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.