Re: Weighting Schemes: Evaluation results

On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 10:02:01PM +0530, Vivek Pal wrote:

> > I don't see any significant hold ups other than
> > that, although I'm not sure (because I haven't had to deal with it
> > before) in what way we need to change the ABI number for these
> > changes.
> 
> I think I have little to add here. Although, I can recall that you
> had mentioned in the mid-term meeting that these changes should go
> into the 1.5 series instead of a brand new thing in the 1.4 release
> or something similar if I remember correctly. :)

I've read up on this now, and it won't affect things until we do a
1.5.0 release, so I'll let Olly take care of that when we get there.

> Actually, as now that the submission week is nearing, I was
> wondering what best fits the list of different pieces of project
> work that have been merged or should it be fine to list them as work
> that hasn't been merged ?

I'm hoping we can get them merged soon, but it's fine to link to the
PRs and include a note saying if they're marked closed then they're on
master.

J

-- 
  James Aylett, occasional trouble-maker
  xapian.org