Re: prioritizing aggregated DBs

Olly Betts <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 06:04:42PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
> > Olly Betts <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:33:08PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
> > > > Or would I fiddle with wdf_inc for all ->index_text and ->add_term
> > > > calls on a per-DB basis?
> > > 
> > > That would probably work if you don't want to be able to vary the
> > > prioritisation dynamically.
> > 
> > That's a compromise I'll have to make, for now.  Thanks for the
> > response!
> 
> BTW, for either approach try to add the databases which are more boosted
> first.  That will tend to mean more good matches are found sooner, which
> will help the matcher take short cuts.

Thanks, I'll keep that in mind.  Btw, is there a way to quickly
figure out which sub-DB a retrieved document or mset item belongs to?

I suppose I could add that info to docdata since I'm having to
reindex, anyways...