Re: Windows Active Directory Domains
Kurt Buff <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Jul 2014 07:23:54 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.basics |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADy1Ce4Em6fGDNyMM-r=NC-ER5FyXJ4OT1NvBgYkDcN3YcOn-w@mail.gmail.com> |
Going bankrupt because of regulatory fines (or just paying a big fine) vs. going bankrupt (or losing lots of money) because of theft of IP or hacked bank accounts isn't much of a choice. They both are outcomes to be avoided by exercising due care. One might argue that the possibility of jail time because of HIPAA provisions or other laws might provide extra incentive, but I haven't seen much of those kinds of penalties - yet. And, if you can achieve the same level of security without the complexity of extra configuration, or the expense of extra staff, then your course is pretty clear. Kurt On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Mikhail A. Utin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > Quote: HR data isn't so much more private than other data (IMHO) that it = needs that kind of special attention - the intellectual property and/or fin= ancial data and/or business processes require pretty much an equal level of= care. > > Not really right as HR deals with personal identifiable information. See,= for instance US MA 201 CMR 17.00, or similar. PI, i.e. legally protected p= ersonal information, is at least one record having any number (like SSN or = a license) and full name. HR has a plenty of such information. > > In any case when you think of protecting data, you need to clarify if any= compliance is required. If do, then you need to check the regulation(s) wh= at it exactly requires. You may build up numerous expensive and technically= correct solutions, but in a case of something goes wrong and protected (in= legal context) data is acquired, your incompliance will be considered firs= t and your efforts as secondary. > > I would remind that there are two parts in information security - legal (= including compliance) and technical. First is more important as relates to = the business directly. If there is no such matter of a compliance in your o= rganization (there is no federal, state, local, industry regulation), then = you are lucky person and have free hands. > > Regards > > Mikhail Utin, CISSP > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] = On Behalf Of Kurt Buff > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 10:22 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Windows Active Directory Domains > > Some questions: > > Who administers the firewalls separating the HR domain from the other dom= ain? > Do the firewall admins also administer either domain? > Are the firewalls between domains even more restrictive of web browsing a= nd other online activity for HR than for the other staff? > Who administers the HR domain, and why are they more trusted than those w= ho administer the larger domain? > > As you probably gather, the situation seems (to me) fraught with redundan= cy and possibility for error. HR data isn't so much more private than other= data (IMHO) that it needs that kind of special attention - the intellectua= l property and/or financial data and/or business processes require pretty m= uch an equal level of care. > > Kurt > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 1:48 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> I have a scenario where I am trying to evaluate the security benefits of= an Active Directory domain structure. >> >> We will call the company XYX Inc. They have an AD Forest/Domain for gene= ral users. They also have a separate AD Forest/Domain for their HR Users th= at is behind a firewall. >> >> The claim is that the separate forests with a one way trust provides the= necessary security to protect the HR Information. >> >> My thinking is that having the users/servers in the same forest would pr= ovide additional benefit of ease of use for the technical team. Using the a= lready existing firewall, separate the servers behind the firewall for the = needed protection of HR files. >> >> Before I make a recommendation of one way or the other, I wanted to elic= it the ideas of others who may have seen similar situations. >> >> Thanks >> >> Joe Brown ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Securing Apache Web Server with thawte Digital Certificate In this guide we examine the importance of Apache-SSL and who needs an SSL certificate. We look at how SSL works, how it benefits your company and how your customers can tell if a site is secure. You will find out how to test, purchase, install and use a thawte Digital Certificate on your Apache web server. Throughout, best practices for set-up are highlighted to help you ensure efficient ongoing management of your encryption keys and digital certificates. http://www.dinclinx.com/Redirect.aspx?36;4175;25;1371;0;5;946;e13b6be442f727d1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------