Re: Enabling cyrus-sasl for gssapi
Dan White <[email protected]> Fri, 15 Dec 2017 11:36:33 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.cyrus.sasl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12/15/17Â 12:21Â -0500, Mark Foley wrote: >Yes, that's the exact page I've been consulting. > >This site: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/postlfs/cyrus-sasl.html >further advises downloading and applying *REQUIRED* patches: > >cyrus-sasl-2.1.26-fixes-3.patch >cyrus-sasl-2.1.26-openssl-1.1.0-1.patch I haven't reviewed the patches, but it's probably a good idea to used them, unless you're using a 2.1.27 prerelease, or you could download the source+patches for your base system (e.g. Debian or Redhat). >Finally, if you've read this far! You wrote in a previous message: > >> I would personally not use saslauthd in the above manner [authenticating with >> sendmail]. If you have a controlled environment where your clients >> (Thunderbird) are known to support GSSAPI negotiation over the network, then >> configuring Sendmail to support GSSAPI directly is secure and recommended. > >The "configuring Sendmail to support GSSAPI directly" is the bit that got my >attention. To clarify, in order to do Sendmail and GSSAPI directly I *do* need >SASL, but *do not* need saslauthd, right? Yes, that's correct. You'd configure Sendmail to use the GSSAPI authentication plugin, but not PLAIN or LOGIN, which would make saslauthd irrelevant.