Re: Cyrus SASL 2.1.28 testing

Simo Sorce <[email protected]> Thu, 18 Nov 2021 11:43:37 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.cyrus.sasl
Organization Red Hat
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 2021-11-17 at 10:32 -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>=20
> --On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 1:28 PM -0500 Simo Sorce=20
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>=20
>=20
> > > <https://github.com/cyrusimap/cyrus-sasl/pull/690>
> >=20
> > Ah great.
> >=20
> > For the javasasl.h issue I am not sure what to do.
> >=20
> > Looking in configure there is a hack to set JAVAH to the binary "true"
> > when JAVAC is not avaialble apparently (I probably do not have JDK
> > installed in this machine) with a comment that this is to make
> > distcheck happy.
> >=20
> > However the Makefile command that generates javasasl.h invokes it as
> > "$(JAVAH) -o javasasl.h ...other options..." which ends up doing
> > nothing as it is run as "true [bunch of ignored options]" and
> > javasasl.h is not generated.
> >=20
> > I wonder if it ever worked, this stuff is 20 years old.
>=20
> The java/ dir was purged from the master branch because it's unsuable.=20
> Perhaps we should just do that with the 2.1 branch as well.

FYI, I tried a few hacks to be able to make distcheck without java
installed, and quickly ran out of patience and ended up just git rm -r
java and removing references to it in configure.ac and Makefile.am

I would be in favor of removing Java because we never compile that
stuff in Fedora, that said, removing a full feature sounds like 2.2
version material, not a minor z version bump ...

Simo.

--=20
Simo Sorce
RHEL Crypto Team
Red Hat, Inc





------------------------------------------
Cyrus: SASL
Permalink: https://cyrus.topicbox.com/groups/sasl/T382d628144c05df6-Ma12f4a=
3424a390960148d03a
Delivery options: https://cyrus.topicbox.com/groups/sasl/subscription