Re: next cyrus-sasl release
* Neustradamus * <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Oct 2025 20:52:39 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.cyrus.sasl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <AS8PR10MB74274D88CB902C2DF9524474CBFAA@AS8PR10MB7427.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> |
Hello =D0=94=D0=B8=D0=BB=D1=8F=D0=BD =D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=83=D0=B7= =D0=BE=D0=B2, Thanks for your message about a new Cyrus-SASL release! It is linked to: - https://github.com/cyrusimap/cyrus-sasl/issues/729 - https://github.com/cyrusimap/cyrus-sasl/issues/835 - https://cyrus.topicbox.com/groups/sasl/T9e94a007b3b4a95d - https://cyrus.topicbox.com/groups/sasl/T4bfea6b1dc01d766 Like you speak about your PR, there is a DCO problem: - https://github.com/cyrusimap/cyrus-sasl/pull/864/checks?check_run_id=3D32= 381454042 I have published a comment here: - https://github.com/cyrusimap/cyrus-sasl/pull/864#issuecomment-2817183483 - https://github.com/cyrusimap/cyrus-sasl/pull/864#issuecomment-3184233441 Can you solve it? Thanks in advance. Regards, Neustradamus ________________________________________ From: =D0=94=D0=B8=D0=BB=D1=8F=D0=BD =D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=83=D0=B7= =D0=BE=D0=B2 <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2025 19:28 To: SASL Subject: Re: next cyrus-sasl release Hello, > It's been about three and a half years since the last cyrus-sasl release. Who can decide on this? Who can delegate tasks? > I'm wondering what needs to be done before a new one is made. E.g. replacing =E2=80=9Cstaticly=E2=80=9D with =E2=80=9Cstatically=E2=80=9D= - https://github.com/cyrusimap/cyrus-sasl/pull/864 . Greetings // =D0=94=D0=B8=D0=BB=D1=8F=D0=BD -----Original Message----- From: Ricardo Signes via SASL <[email protected]> Reply-To: SASL <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: next cyrus-sasl release Date: 24/09/25 20:09:53 Heya, It's been about three and a half years since the last cyrus-sasl release. = I'm wondering what needs to be done before a new one is made. In GitHub I see a milestone called 2.1.29, but nothing in it. On the other= hand, there's a 2.2.0 milestone with 10 items undone. To what extent does= anybody consider these real blockers. That is: Are we better off not ship= ping anything until these are done, or shipping a new release without these= done? (Don't say "we should ship now and it should have all these done". = That's not the question! On the other hand "we should ship but only after= these two items are done" is useful.) I can get some development time to throw at this, for the sake of Cyrus IMA= P downstream users, but it's not immediately clear which things are houseke= eping and which are serious problems. If there is some active[-enough] cyr= us-sasl dev who can chime in, I would appreciate it. -- rjbs Cyrus / SASL / seediscussions +participants +delivery options Permalink ------------------------------------------ Cyrus: SASL Permalink: https://cyrus.topicbox.com/groups/sasl/T4bfea6b1dc01d766-M069c78= 4c5b84065b3bc2914d Delivery options: https://cyrus.topicbox.com/groups/sasl/subscription