Re: Request for Feedback - Zeek Process Supervision Model

Thanks a lot for doing this. Those who don't want to replace broctl shall
do a triple back salto. No one? I see.

I have only one request so far, still reading the proposal. Can we make
sure that we support a configuration where in a stable state (after
initialization has been done) there is only one worker process per core,
without all those run-bro scripts and the like?

1 process per core = timer ticking disabled = trips to kernel and back
minimized, no partial cache flushing, no partial TLB flushing and higher
performance.


On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 6:44 PM Jon Siwek <[email protected]> wrote:

> I just published some design thoughts related to a major new Zeek
> feature that's planned/upcoming: a process supervision model that may
> act as an alternative (successor) to BroControl.  Find that here:
>
> https://blog.zeek.org/2019/03/beyond-brocontrol-new-process.html
>
> Feel free to use this mailing list / thread to provide feedback, thanks.
>
> - Jon
> _______________________________________________
> Zeek mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/zeek
>

_______________________________________________
Zeek mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/zeek