Re: Running Zeek & Suricata on Same Network Interface

TQ <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.detection.bro
Message-ID <CAM2MKSo9Mio4Pwtbuo49dapSuO6B3-Otq5pxVvxA6mNtGwL6uw@mail.gmail.com>
Thank you Michal and Patrick!  I learned something new today and will take
a look at your git repo. to learn more.  I currently have them both on
docker for easy maintenance (reload if something goes wrong).  Have a great
weekend!

On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 4:15 PM Patrick Kelley <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Works fine.
>
> I've used a docker container once, for this purpose.  It did fine, but
> like Michal, I don't recommend it.
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 7:10 PM Michał Purzyński <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> There is no need to use SR-IOV and other fancy features, everything just
>> works. Not sure about docker, I don't use that for any production-worthy
>> workload (for performance reasons, it corrupts data randomly, etc).
>>
>> Just use AF_Packet and use a different cluster_id for each and you will
>> be fine. You can even use different number of threads (for Suri) and
>> processes (for Zeek).
>>
>> The first part of SEPTun I wrote with Suricata devs might be useful for
>> Zeek as well. And keep asking questions.
>>
>> https://github.com/pevma/SEPTun
>> https://github.com/pevma/SEPTun-Mark-II/blob/master/README.md
>>
>> Sharing host between Suricata and Zeek is how we run our office sensors.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 12:52 AM TQ <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> Has anyone ran Zeek and Suricata (or something similar) off from the
>>> same network interface; especially via docker?  If yes, did you see any
>>> issues at all?  I shortly ran both off from the same interface, but wasn't
>>> very sure due to minimum traffic.  Is it better to get a fancy Intel NIC
>>> with SR-IOV feature and spawn off virtual interfaces?  Have a great weekend
>>> all.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Zeek mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/zeek
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Zeek mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/zeek
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Patrick Kelley, CISSP, C|EH, ITIL*
> *CTO*
> [email protected]
> (o) 770-224-6482
>
> *The limit to which you have accepted being comfortable is the limit to
> which you have grown. Accept new challenges as an opportunity to enrich
> yourself and not as a point of potential failure.*
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Zeek mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/zeek
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.