Re: dpd.sig rejection syntax
TQ <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.detection.bro |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAM2MKSof5M90H6Hm9anP+KQZGUKqiHUPFfpWe1T7Cn5vHXntnw@mail.gmail.com> |
Thanks Jon. Life saver as always! On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 11:22 AM Jon Siwek <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 2:58 PM TQ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > There are two protocols, A and B which use <STX> and <ETX> to > encapsulate their data. Both protocols operate over 20+ ports, and the > only difference is that protocol B starts with lowercase 's' after \x02. > I've looked over the dpd.sig files on Zeek GitHub but didn't find anything > for rejection. > > Here's more extensive documentation on signatures: > > https://docs.zeek.org/en/latest/frameworks/signatures.html > > The negated "requires-signature" condition may be relevant to you. > > > I've tried adding (!s), [!s] after \x02, but protocol A stops > logging... so I know there's a syntax issue. > > The syntax generally follows these rules: > > http://westes.github.io/flex/manual/Patterns.html > > So [^s] means "anything except an 's' character" > > - Jon > _______________________________________________ Zeek mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/zeek