Re: af_packet vs pfring
"Edgmand, Craig" <[email protected]> Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:39:05 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.detection.bro |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CY4PR03MB2615CC9D37682DE52B9B018DE3490@CY4PR03MB2615.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> |
If your kernel supports it you should use af_packet. It is built in and pf_ring is a giant pain in the ass. ☺ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of venkatesh bandari Sent: Friday, November 22, 2019 8:14 AM To: zeek <[email protected]> Subject: [Zeek] af_packet vs pfring **External Email - Please verify sender email address before responding.** Hello team, could anyone share ideas/thoughts which one to use either pf_ring or af_packet to load balance. any recommendations. Thanks Venkatesh _______________________________________________ Zeek mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/zeek