Re: what comes after firehol?

Rick Marshall <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.firewalls.firehol.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 13/06/2011, at 1:03 AM, Paul Fox wrote:

> thanks everyone.  okay, i'm somewhat reassured that firehol hasn't
> become irrelevant, and private mail from phil whineray regarding his
> ipv6 mods tells me that there's at least some continued interest in
> maintaining it.
> 
> andrew wrote:
>> Advanced Policy Firewall
>> (http://www.rfxn.com/projects/advanced-policy-firewall/) seems to
>> be similar to firehol.  I've looked at it but haven't tried it out
>> since firehol still meets my needs.
> 
> thanks -- somehow that hadn't turned up in my searches.  no ipv6 support
> (promised "soon" about 7 months ago) though.
> 
>> 
>> fwbuilder is, in my mind, quite different and not nearly as useful, since it
>> can't be scripted.  It's fundamentally a GUI tool, and I find that the GUI
>> actually obscures the high-level view that I want of my firewall.  A
>> firehol+bash script is clearer and more flexible.
> 
> when i first started using fwbuilder, i actually found the gui/drag-n-drop
> model to be quite nice.  but as time goes on, i think i agree with you.
> 
> anyway, i'll stick with firehol for the time being.
> 
> as i mentioned, i have changes to firehol which let it build a script
> on one machine which will run on another -- in my case the target is
> openwrt.  (i'd rather not install bash on my embedded router.)  i have
> those patches in my own git tree, and they're not really ready for
> public consumption.   i think i should probably start over using phil's
> ipv6 tree as a basis before trying to clean them up.
> 
> oh -- as for the get-iana.sh thing -- i also have changes (based on
> an XML extractor script written in shell) which update get-iana.sh to
> use the new IANA file.  the output, after run through "aggregate",
> is:
>    RESERVED_IPS="0.0.0.0/8 10.0.0.0/8 127.0.0.0/8 224.0.0.0/3"

you have left out 192.168.0.0/16 and 172.16.0.0/12

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_network

there's also some in 169.254

> do other people agree?  given this, as others have said, i don't think
> the get-iana mechanism is really worth maintaining anymore.
> 
> paul
> =---------------------
> paul fox, [email protected] (arlington, ma, where it's 48.9 degrees)
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
> authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
> Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Firehol-support mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firehol-support

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev

_______________________________________________
Firehol-support mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firehol-support
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.