Re: what comes after firehol?
Rick Marshall <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.firehol.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 13/06/2011, at 1:03 AM, Paul Fox wrote: > thanks everyone. okay, i'm somewhat reassured that firehol hasn't > become irrelevant, and private mail from phil whineray regarding his > ipv6 mods tells me that there's at least some continued interest in > maintaining it. > > andrew wrote: >> Advanced Policy Firewall >> (http://www.rfxn.com/projects/advanced-policy-firewall/) seems to >> be similar to firehol. I've looked at it but haven't tried it out >> since firehol still meets my needs. > > thanks -- somehow that hadn't turned up in my searches. no ipv6 support > (promised "soon" about 7 months ago) though. > >> >> fwbuilder is, in my mind, quite different and not nearly as useful, since it >> can't be scripted. It's fundamentally a GUI tool, and I find that the GUI >> actually obscures the high-level view that I want of my firewall. A >> firehol+bash script is clearer and more flexible. > > when i first started using fwbuilder, i actually found the gui/drag-n-drop > model to be quite nice. but as time goes on, i think i agree with you. > > anyway, i'll stick with firehol for the time being. > > as i mentioned, i have changes to firehol which let it build a script > on one machine which will run on another -- in my case the target is > openwrt. (i'd rather not install bash on my embedded router.) i have > those patches in my own git tree, and they're not really ready for > public consumption. i think i should probably start over using phil's > ipv6 tree as a basis before trying to clean them up. > > oh -- as for the get-iana.sh thing -- i also have changes (based on > an XML extractor script written in shell) which update get-iana.sh to > use the new IANA file. the output, after run through "aggregate", > is: > RESERVED_IPS="0.0.0.0/8 10.0.0.0/8 127.0.0.0/8 224.0.0.0/3" you have left out 192.168.0.0/16 and 172.16.0.0/12 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_network there's also some in 169.254 > do other people agree? given this, as others have said, i don't think > the get-iana mechanism is really worth maintaining anymore. > > paul > =--------------------- > paul fox, [email protected] (arlington, ma, where it's 48.9 degrees) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content > authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image > Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Firehol-support mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firehol-support ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Firehol-support mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firehol-support