Re: Sanewall update
Phil Whineray <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.firehol.devel,gmane.comp.security.firewalls.firehol.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADxe29_ORi4VSrpFwSetzMn2bLqvkgD-faHQ23q1upRO6xL71Q@mail.gmail.com> |
On 9 May 2012 20:46, SanskritFritz <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Phil Whineray <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> >> - If you package for a distribution, please let me know if you would >> like to include sanewall and if you need anything from me to help out. > > > The building process does not differ too much from firehol's I suppose? So > one can start from the firehol package as basis I think. I'm planning to > create an archlinux package. > Great! There is very little difference from firehol. I am trying to standardise the command as living in /sbin (as the official firehol debian package did) or /usr/sbin since init systems seem to be diverging currently. Mainly there is just a few file name changes and a couple of man pages also upstreamed from the debian package. Phil ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/