Re: Key loggers and others that communicate back to a base
Robin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.firehol.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
My setup is that I have a main desktop Ubuntu machine, and a second ubuntu machine that I use as a media center that is attached to my TV and accesses the internet via the same ADSL router. I also have a dvr that is directly connected to the router, and that is used to access videos stored on the main desktop machine. I use rygel as the DLNA controller. I also use VPN occasionally. Then there is the suggestion from Costa, which I would like to incorporate into the setup. Has anyone done something similar in Firehol that I could copy or at least use as a starter or am I being over ambitious in what I would like to do with Firehol? Robin Tsaousis, Costa wrote on 03/09/14 00:04: Firehol will do just fine allowing very specific services from your LAN machines to the internet. For HTTP/HTTPS I suggest to install a proxy and control the allowed URLs there. So, direct layer 3 HTTP/HTTPS should not be allowed. Only through the proxy. Firehol can also setup a transparent HTTP proxy for you (but not HTTPS - HTTPS cannot be intercepted - the clients will have to be configured to use the proxy for HTTPS). Costa On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 1:35 AM, Whit Blauvelt <[email protected] > wrote: To the degree it can set what types of services you can be a client of, yes. But if the key logger or whatever is using an HTTP(S) POST or GET to send your data across, and you allow HTTP(S) clients out over the firewall, you've still got trouble. You could allow only HTTP(S) clients to connect to specific IPs. For most of us, that would be a nonstarter. But if you wanted to have a system that could only connect to your bank, and your bank's at a fixed IP, you could easily do that. Whit On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 08:45:14PM +0100, Robin wrote: > I feel I need to install a firewall and ubuntu comes with a very simple one, > but I noticed it did not stop outgoing comms, or provide for a white list, > dealing with communications going from key loggers, zombie machines, etc. > Does firehol help in this regard? > > > _______________________________________________ > Firehol-support mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firehol.org/mailman/listinfo/firehol-support _______________________________________________ Firehol-support mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firehol.org/mailman/listinfo/firehol-support _______________________________________________ Firehol-support mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firehol.org/mailman/listinfo/firehol-support