Re: locking down a dual stack bridging firewall with firehol
Phineas Gage <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.firehol.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
That would be interesting for me, because I’ve been thinking about exactly this, multiple DSLs, when it doesn’t look there’s going to be anything faster available in our area for a long time. I haven’t asked my ISP if they support bonding, but I think it would be costly anyway, and they might want to control the routers on our end. I still hope to also post my config as an example to the Wiki, when I get some time and maybe after I’m satisfied with the bridging. Maybe two configs, one for routing and one for bridging. > On Nov 13, 2014, at 1:43 PM, Tsaousis, Costa <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I can’t stress enough the difference that the FireQOS (and probably fq_codel) has made for us. We can have 10 or more active users on our 4 Mbps / 0.3 Mbps ADSL, and well, at least you can still browse the web, to some extent. :) > > That's very nice. > I have 3x ADSL (6 Mbps down / 1Mbps up) balanced on 130 users and it > is working very nice too... > I have another script 'smart-routing.sh' that handles the balancing > (configures balancing and re-configures it when ADSLs come up or go > down). I have not pushed it to FireHOL yet, because it is very poorly > written, but if you want to add more ADSLs and balance them, I could > write a small wiki page on how to use it. > > Thanks, > > Costa _______________________________________________ Firehol-support mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firehol.org/mailman/listinfo/firehol-support