Re: How can I target all of the 10.67. network EXCEPT my LAN on 10.67.5.?

"Tsaousis, Costa" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.firewalls.firehol.user
Message-ID <CANL+VpbEpb0SiHXLFKpZA4yR2nxdttq-O_otxAqp14=vOpQ2Ow@mail.gmail.com>
and... it is always a good practice to put 'dst' in interfaces, but
keep in mind that you might also need to add the network broadcast
address, and in case of multicast, the ${MULTICAST_IPS} variable too.



On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:28 PM, Tsaousis, Costa <[email protected]> wrote:
> I forgot to mention that you can actually make some packets continue
> from interface to interface with policy return.
>
> For example,
>
> interface4 eth1 my_lan src "10.67.5.0/24 " dst 10.67.5.1
>    policy return
>
>    server ssh accept
>
>
> interface4 eth1 tslan src "10.67.0.0/16" dst 10.67.5.1
>    policy reject
>
>    server smtp accept
>
> The above means that "10.67.5.0/24" will be able to use both ssh and
> smtp, while all other IPs in 10.67.0.0/16 will only use smtp.
>
> Remember:
>
> - default policy for interfaces is drop
> - default policy for router is return
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Tsaousis, Costa <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Rich,
>>
>> The flow the packets travel is from top to bottom.
>> If something is matched, is stopped there.
>>
>> So, this
>>
>> interface4 eth1 my_lan src "10.67.5.0/24 " dst 10.67.5.1
>> ...
>>
>> interface4 eth1 tslan src "10.67.0.0/16" dst 10.67.5.1
>> ...
>>
>> means that 10.67.5.0/24 will be stopped at my_lan.
>>
>> In FireHOL, you cannot write both positive and negative expressions of
>> the same parameter.
>> There are a few ways to overcome this:
>>
>> First is the flow. Match the more specific thing first.
>> Then you can have groups, like this:
>>
>> interface4 eth1 tslan src "10.67.0.0/16" dst 10.67.5.1
>>
>>    group with src "10.67.5.0/24 "
>>       server all accept
>>       client all accept
>>    group end
>>
>>    ... servers/clients for all other IPs in 10.67.0.0/16 ...
>>
>> Groups can be nested. You can have groups within groups within groups, etc.
>> The flow though, is always important. It also optimizes the firewall.
>> Always try putting the most frequent services, the ones with the most
>> traffic, near the top. This saves some CPU cycles on your machine.
>>
>> So the first warnings you get are there to let you know that you
>> actually overwrote the first 'src' parameter with the second 'src'
>> parameter.
>>
>> Regarding the last warning, it is not something to worry if you don't
>> need it. Something is missing from your kernel probably (conntrack
>> helpers for ftp, tftp, sip, pptp, etc).
>> Which distribution and kernel version are you using? Have you compiled
>> the kernel yourself or is a distribution supplied one?
>>
>> Costa
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> (thanks to all who replied to my previous post - I've compiled v3rc from
>>> source on one of my Debian Wheezy boxes)
>>>
>>> I'm roughly trying to do this:
>>>
>>> interface4 eth1 my_lan src "10.67.5.0/24 " dst 10.67.5.1
>>>  policy accept
>>>
>>> interface4 eth1 tslan src "10.67.0.0/16" src not "10.67.5.0/24" dst
>>> 10.67.5.1
>>>  policy reject
>>>  server ssh accept
>>>
>>> interface4 eth1 interweb src not "${UNROUTABLE_IPS} 10.67.0.0/16 " dst
>>> 10.67.5.1
>>>  policy reject
>>>  server ssh accept
>>>  server openvpn accept
>>>
>>> In words: my server sits on a VLAN, 10.67.5.0/24 and provides a bunch of
>>> services to others on that VLAN. The server is not the gateway for the
>>> VLAN. There are other VLANs under 10.67.0.0/16 and I want to restrict
>>> access to the server from them. Then there's the rest of the internet,
>>> and I need to give it access to openvpn that runs on the server.
>>>
>>> WITH THIS SET UP I'M WARNED (TWICE, ONCE CREATING INPUT ONCE CREATING
>>> OUTPUT):
>>>
>>> WHY    : OVERWRITING PARAM: SRC4 '10.67.5.0/24' BECOMES '10.67.0.0/16'
>>>
>>> HOW CAN I TARGET ALL OF THE 10.67. NETWORK EXCEPT MY LAN ON 10.67.5.?
>>>
>>> I also get:
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> WARNING : This might or might not affect the operation of your firewall.
>>> WHAT : A runtime command failed to execute (returned error 255).
>>> SOURCE : FIN
>>> COMMAND : /sbin/sysctl -w net.netfilter.nf_conntrack_helper=1
>>> OUTPUT :
>>>
>>> SYSCTL: CANNOT STAT /PROC/SYS/NET/NETFILTER/NF_CONNTRACK_HELPER: NO SUCH
>>> FILE OR DIRECTORY
>>>
>>> Any reason for that and do I need to worry?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Rich
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Firehol-support mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.firehol.org/mailman/listinfo/firehol-support
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.