Re: FireHOL 3.0.0: USE_MAINTAINER_MODE

Perfect!

update-ipsets depends on it
firehol uses it - it will complain if missing, but will work with less
functionality if missing
the other tools do not currently use it.

Jerome, I'll also like to release netdata (http://netdata.firehol.org,
https://github.com/firehol/netdata).
Since this will be its first, is there anything required for it be
packaged for debian?

Merry Christmas!

Costa


On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Jerome BENOIT <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Phil:
>
> On 26/12/15 20:35, Phil Whineray wrote:
>>
>> On 26 Dec 2015 19:00, "Jerome BENOIT" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>> I am intriguing by ``if test x"$USE_MAINTAINER_MODE" = xno; then [...] fi'' :
>>> may I understand that iprange is not needed in non maintainer mode (namely in general mode) ?
>>> Same for bash version check ?
>>
>> Hi Jerome
>>
>> I don't have the wherewithal to check the logic is correct right now but it is supposed to work the opposite to what you state.
>>
>> Maintainer mode is for building the release packages which does not require a particular bash version or iprange whereas they are needed to actually run the scripts.
>>
>
> I think that maintainer-mode is rather meant to superseed all build mode,
> with in mind to refresh all material.
>
> So iprange is mandatory for version 3.
>
> Otherwise, for which script iprange is needed ? the three of them ?
> I am on my way to package iprange for Debian [1].
>
>
>> Cheers
>> Phil
>>
>
>
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=809024
> _______________________________________________
> Firehol-support mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firehol.org/mailman/listinfo/firehol-support
_______________________________________________
Firehol-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firehol.org/mailman/listinfo/firehol-support