Re: netdata

Hi again,

I need some feedback guys.

Are you using netdata regularly?

What is the most important thing you miss?

To my view it is stable and pretty fast (although, I don't like the
shell scripted plugins which I plan to move to node.js - they increase
the total CPU consumption of netdata a lot).

This is my short term TODO list:

1. Improve the web UI a bit (today I realized there is no way to zoom
in/out the charts using the touchpad)

2. Work on its memory footprint to allow longer durations (probably
split it in a short in-ram db and a longer on disk compressed db)

What do you think?

I know there are many more to do.
But my primary goal is to have a stable and usable environment to build upon.

So, do you use it?
Are you happy with it?
Is there anyone among us that has installed it on all his/her servers?
(I have, of course :)

Thanks,

Costa


On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 12:27 AM, Rick Marshall <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks Costa. I'll keep you posted.
>
>
> On 12/02/16 19:23, Tsaousis, Costa wrote:
>
> Also,
>
> the dashboard supports documentation per chart. There we could write
> information about interpreting each chart, add links to external web sites,
> etc.
> If anyone is willing to help, please open a github issue to give you
> instructions on how to commit such info.
>
> Netdata is able to get system information for a lot more things that is
> currently presenting. In the source, I have commented all the code that
> collects data I don't know its value. Check this for example:
> https://github.com/firehol/netdata/blob/master/src/proc_vmstat.c
> It have written the code to collect 100 metrics, but only 5 are enabled. If
> you know the importance of the rest, please open github issues too.
>
> Costa
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Tsaousis, Costa <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> 1. all the sections on the wiki have been implemented, but the empty ones
>> are undocumented... Check your /var/log/netdata/error.log (it should be
>> complaining about nginx and all the other modules that cannot automatically
>> detect their config).
>>
>> 2. redhat/fedora, unfortunately no. I have installed it on debian/ubuntu,
>> arch, gentoo. If you can help, please open github issues.
>>
>> Costa
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 6:16 AM, Rick Marshall <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> You should be proud of it.
>>>
>>> Q: redhat/fedora support. Wiki has debian/ubuntu instructions. Have you
>>> installed on redhat/fedora?
>>>
>>> If not I will build an send results.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/02/16 10:42, Tsaousis, Costa wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Have you checked netdata lately?
>>>>
>>>> Well, I am really proud for it...
>>>>
>>>> http://netdata.firehol.org/
>>>>
>>>> Check its wiki too (work in progress):
>>>> https://github.com/firehol/netdata/wiki
>>>>
>>>> Costa
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Firehol-support mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.firehol.org/mailman/listinfo/firehol-support
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Rick Marshall*
>>> Director
>>> Zenucom Pty Ltd
>>> +61 411 287530
>>> www.zenucom.com <http://www.zenucom.com>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Firehol-support mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.firehol.org/mailman/listinfo/firehol-support
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Rick Marshall
> Director
> Zenucom Pty Ltd
> +61 411 287530
> www.zenucom.com
_______________________________________________
Firehol-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firehol.org/mailman/listinfo/firehol-support