Re: Dual connection fast route problems

Ross Barker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.firewalls.ipfilter
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Problem solved.  I was trying to divert the packet too late.  The 
rerouting/diversion of the packet needed to occur on the "pass in" from 
ste3 (the internal interface) as the packet was already routed by the 
time I was trying to move it on the way out ste4.

Ross Barker wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am using IP Filter: v4.1.13 on FreeBSD 6.2 and have an issue I can't 
> seem to resolve with the help of google or the ipf documentation I have 
> found.  Perhaps someone can assist.  I am no expert with IP Filter but I 
> have an okay grasp of it and have been using it for quite some time 
> successfully for basic firewalling functions.
> 
> If there is a better list to ask such questions on please point me to it.
> 
> I also might be going about this entirely the wrong way, but I don't 
> know of any better way.
> 
> Basically what I am trying to achieve is dual Internet connection to a 
> single internal NAT'ed email server for receiving mail in a redundant 
> fashion.  However I can't get the return packets to go back out the 
> interface which is the non-default route on the gateway.  The packets 
> come in fine and on the way back out the gateway I catch them with IP 
> Filters "to interface:ip" syntax and try to push them back out that way. 
>  This technique is called fast route I think.  The rule catches the 
> packets going back out, and changes the IP correctly to the one 
> specified in the rule however it does not re-route the packet into the 
> specified outgoing interface.
> 
> Here is my setup
> 
> * Hosts/Connections
> 
> Gateway:
> FreeBSD 6.2 - IP Filter: v4.1.13
> 3 network interfaces of interest
> 
> - primary internet connection: ste4
> static IP: 1.2.3.4
> 
> - secondary internet connection: tun0 (pppoe)
> static IP: 5.6.7.8
> Simple ppp setup via /etc/ppp/ppp.conf
> 
> - Internal LAN : ste3 (ethernet) 192.168.1.1
> 
> Then we have on the LAN:
> 
> Internal Linux host running SMTP with IPs 192.168.1.15 and 192.168.1.16
> 
> 
> * Inbound NAT config
> The primary Internet connections NAT is done by a router beyond ste4, it 
> does translation of 1.2.3.4:25 -> 192.168.1.15:25
> 
> The secondary Internet connection uses ipnat configured on the gateway 
> to redirect traffic
> rdr tun0 5.6.7.8/32 port 25 -> 192.168.1.16 port 25 tcp
> 
> The default route on the gateway points out ste4 to the primary Internet 
> connection.
> 
> Inbound SMTP connections to 1.2.3.4:25 work fine as it uses the default 
> outbound route on the gateway.
> 
> For the secondary connection I have a rule in the ipf.rules like this to 
> catch the returning server -> client packets as they exit the default 
> outbound route interface of the gateway (ste4).
> 
> pass out log quick on ste4 to tun0:5.6.7.8 proto tcp from 192.168.1.16 
> port = 25 to any
> 
> I know this rule is catching the packets and logging them, but its not 
> changing the outbound interface to tun0.  The IP does change to 5.6.7.8 
> as I can see them with tcpdump sailing out the ste4 interface.
> 
> I have successfully used the fast route syntax in other places in my 
> ruleset to affect the route of outgoing connections so I figure I have 
> the syntax right.
> 
> Appologies if this is bastardry of ipfilter, but it seems in theory that 
> it should work.
> 
> Any help is appreciated.
> 
> Regards,
> Ross
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.