Re: IPFilter no more?
Darren Reed <[email protected]> Sat, 06 Nov 2010 01:21:57 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.ipfilter |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <11441_1289031924_4CD510F3_11441_10675_1_4CD51025.9090809@reed.wattle.id.au> |
Gabriele Bulfon wrote: > Hi Darren, happy to read you again :) > > I find it absurd that you can't use your spare time for your own stuff. > Does it mean that if you write 2 lines of code at 2:00am in your > house, that is still Oracle's IP??? > It's madness! As long as it relates to something in which they have business interests, then yes. For example, if I made a patch to the Linux kernel to fix a bug at home, Oracle would own that IP (consider Oracle Enterprise Linux) even though I don't work on OEL. On the other hand, if I were to patch FreeBSD for a similar reason, Oracle would still own that because I would be working on an "operating system" and Oracle is in the business of manufacturing "operating systems" (Solaris & OEL.) Darren > > -= Mail sent through WebTop2 =- > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Da: Darren Reed <[email protected]> > A: Gabriele Bulfon <[email protected]> > Cc: Simon Chang <[email protected]> [email protected] > Data: 4 novembre 2010 6.11.11 CET > Oggetto: Re: IPFilter no more? > > Oracle has no problems with me doing it but would own all of the > intellectual property (i.e copyright) for all of the work that I > would do. > *I* have a problem with that given that I would be doing it on my > time > and it would be me handing out freebies to a very wealthy man/company. > > > Gabriele Bulfon wrote: > > The question is not if Darren intends, but if Oracle still permits > > Darren to continue open development. > > My fear is that we'll have another fork... > > > > -= Mail sent through WebTop2 =- > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > *Da:* Simon Chang <[email protected]> > > *A:* [email protected] > > *Data:* 29 ottobre 2010 9.18.41 CEST > > *Oggetto:* Re: IPFilter no more? > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Summum Bonum <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Yeah.. I am wondering about that too. Where is Darren Reed? I > > did a cvs > > on the latest branch, and there is no update for a while. > > > > I am about to rip out the public version of ip filter replace > > with the > > official Sun/Oracle version. Look like that is the supported > > version > > going forward for us Sun admin.. Just upgraded to Solaris 10 > > update 9, > > and I don't bother to it against 5.1.0 :( > > > > > > Hi, > > > > Long time ipfilter user, but first time posting on the mailing > > list. I have various versions of FreeBSD running ipf 4.1.28, and I > > have been frustrated by the fact that the documentation seems > > muddled and confusing regarding the exact compilation procedure > > for 5.1.0. > > > > Also, yes, based on the list volume that I checked, this list > > seems to be *VERY* low-volume and has been that way for a while > > now. Does anyone know what the status is for ipfilter, what the > > general direction is, and whether Darren intends to continue > > development? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Simon Chang > > > > > >