Re: captive portal on multiple interfaces
Lee Sharp <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.m0n0wall |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Chris Buechler wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Lee Sharp <[email protected]> wrote: >> Jonathan De Graeve - M0n0wall wrote: >>> Very simple, >>> >>> Our current CP structure is not yet up for it. We first have to migrate to >>> a new 'storage' container for the CP information. >>> >>> I don't think multiple interfaces will be there soon, nor is it a >>> requirement if you use it in a routed environment. >> Would this fix the "No CP and bridge on the same box" problem? I am running >> into that one now, quite a bit. >> > > Unlikely, that's because the user has to be directed to a portal site > of some sort and bridged setups don't have IPs on the bridge. But... I am bridging opt1 to WAN, and running CP on LAN. LAN has an IP, and opt1 does not need CP. I just want the devices "outside the firewall" (as far as they know) to go through the traffic shaper. Lee