RE: Beta 1.3b17 released
"Mohammed Ismail" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.m0n0wall |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Chris, about starting new thread, is it big issue to have the option subnet mask in xml configuration available.? I mean what should I edit to have this done? Thanks Mohammed. -----Original Message----- From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2009 9:38 PM Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] Beta 1.3b17 released On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Mohammed Ismail<[email protected]> wrote: > I have got an open wifi system connected to that m0n0wall. Allot of people > connecting actually not even 500 but I never put it in that way, I just hit > a number. > > I agree with what you said, about available xml options. > Now the question is. What it needs to have the option subnet mask. To assign > a subnet mask for clients that does not match the LAN subnet which in my > case , > LAN : 10.10.0.0/16 > Option subnet 255.255.255.255 > Is there checks on m0n0wall to make sure that clients get same subnet as > LAN? You should really start a new thread, this has no relevance to the 1.3b17 release. You never want your DHCP serving something different from your LAN subnet. If you want multiple internal subnets, use multiple interfaces or VLANs. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]