RE: Beta 1.3b17 released

"Mohammed Ismail" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.firewalls.m0n0wall
Message-ID <[email protected]>
But I did try it under FreeBSD 6.4 
With ISC DHCP Server 3.0 
And I got 192.168.1.150/32 subnet with gateway 192.168.1.1
And it was working with no problem.
I know from the beginning that you cannot put different subnet than the
gateway's mask, but it seems, windows does not allow this, but it could be
assigned remotely via DHCP , 
Althout you can assign static route via DHCP ..

Regards,
Mohammed 

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2009 9:47 AM
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] Beta 1.3b17 released

2009/8/16 Mohammed Ismail <[email protected]>:
>
>
> is it big issue to have the option subnet
> mask in xml configuration available.? I mean what should I edit to have
this
> done?
>

You're missing the point - you can't do this. In a properly configured
network, DHCP clients will never have a different mask from their
gateway. You can't give clients a /32 mask, their gateway IP would
then fall outside their subnet. You can't do a /30 without lots of
additional IPs on the firewall and a DHCP mess with numerous scopes.
If you need to isolate clients, you need to do it on your APs and/or
switches, there is no reasonable way to accomplish this on the
firewall.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.