RE: Beta 1.3b17 released
"Mohammed Ismail" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.m0n0wall |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
But I did try it under FreeBSD 6.4 With ISC DHCP Server 3.0 And I got 192.168.1.150/32 subnet with gateway 192.168.1.1 And it was working with no problem. I know from the beginning that you cannot put different subnet than the gateway's mask, but it seems, windows does not allow this, but it could be assigned remotely via DHCP , Althout you can assign static route via DHCP .. Regards, Mohammed -----Original Message----- From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2009 9:47 AM Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] Beta 1.3b17 released 2009/8/16 Mohammed Ismail <[email protected]>: > > > is it big issue to have the option subnet > mask in xml configuration available.? I mean what should I edit to have this > done? > You're missing the point - you can't do this. In a properly configured network, DHCP clients will never have a different mask from their gateway. You can't give clients a /32 mask, their gateway IP would then fall outside their subnet. You can't do a /30 without lots of additional IPs on the firewall and a DHCP mess with numerous scopes. If you need to isolate clients, you need to do it on your APs and/or switches, there is no reasonable way to accomplish this on the firewall. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]