Re: Replace mini_httpd?

Chris Buechler <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.firewalls.m0n0wall
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Richard
Parvass<[email protected]> wrote:
> The entire filesystem on the flash is held in RAM, so if you increase the
> filesystem size, you increase the RAM requirement. Many embedded devices
> have 128MB or less RAM.
>
> Package size is therefore a big argument for mini_httpd.
>

Exactly.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.