Re: Replace mini_httpd?
Ralf Hesse <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.m0n0wall |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Is there no possibility to increase these kiddy 128 MB RAM?? I think we should also have a look forward...? There are now standard-RAMs with at least 2 GB available... Do these embedded Boards not use standard-SIMMs? May be we should give some ideas for redesign??;-( Ralf Chris Buechler schrieb: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Richard > Parvass<[email protected]> wrote: >> The entire filesystem on the flash is held in RAM, so if you increase the >> filesystem size, you increase the RAM requirement. Many embedded devices >> have 128MB or less RAM. >> >> Package size is therefore a big argument for mini_httpd. >> > > Exactly. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >