Re: Replace mini_httpd?
Lee Sharp <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.m0n0wall |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
rene moser wrote: > Hi Manuel > > Manuel Kasper wrote: >> mini_httpd (the web server used in m0n0wall) returns the 401 almost >> immediately (after receiving the headers) and closes the connection, >> which Safari doesn't like. > Are there any plans to replace mini_httpd in next major version of > m0n0wall? > > http://nginx.net/ would be great. > > I mean, 1 GB flash cards are almost as cheep as 16 MB flash cards. So > package size is not really an argument for mini_httpd anymore. It is when you have 75 firewalls all over with 16 meg flash cards in them! Remember that your environment is not everyone's environment. :) Ralf Hesse wrote: > Is there no possibility to increase these kiddy 128 MB RAM?? In many cases, no. (Or at least not without a soldering iron and some real skill.) > I think we should also have a look forward...? Define forward... Remember that your environment... :) > There are now standard-RAMs with at least 2 GB available... > Do these embedded Boards not use standard-SIMMs? Almost none of them. > May be we should give some ideas for redesign??;-( Some people did. You may be a better fit for pfsense. http://www.pfsense.com/ It is a fork, but a lot of them are here, and a lot of us are there... Lee