Re: using common topology through captive portal
Lee Sharp <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.m0n0wall |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mike Nichols wrote: > > Though i plan to try this out late tonight, i was hoping to get some > feedback on it beforehand. > > i plan to connect two offices through use of physical connections that > must include the captive portal. What i mean is that the only way to > connect the two locations is use of infrastructure that is using the > captive portal. so i'm thinking of just applying pass rules and setting > static IPs on those machines corresponding to the network outside the > captive portal. My question is this, when using the pass through mac, what > is actually happening? is it just routing the traffic around the portal? > Will the packets make it through the portal, through the pass rules and act > as usual (probably without multicast)? Passthrough MAC is not what you think. You still need to use a web browser first, but you are "pre authenticated" so you never see the login. What you want is allowed IP addresses. And yes, you will need to type in a lot. However, the "ANY - > IP on remote network" is handy, and they will still need to log in for web surfing. Lee