Re: Future plans after 1.3?
Dennis Karlsson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.m0n0wall |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
No need to be an ignorant prick. Most of us already know pfSense. Why do we have captive portal, traffic shaper, WOL, dynamic DNS client etc. These are not firewall services, but really nice to have features. I would not use UPnP if it was in m0n0wall, but if people want it I guess they have a reason for it. / Dennis Mike Nichols wrote: > ok, this is getting silly. > MySQL will never come packaged in m0n0wall. why? google > > Please don't ever put UPnP in m0n0wall. nor RIP. nor BGP. nor linux. > > to anyone who wants UPnP on a similar system: > use pfSense. AND It's extremely similar. (there is a joke in that > sentence, those of you who get it will at least smile) > > pfSense even has an embedded version AND THE LATEST VERSION OF BSD!!! =O > > lets just stop the craziness and keep things small that are intended to > be, and build packages for those systems that accommodate them. > > mike-- > > included is one link for your reading pleasure: > http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22760356-M0n0wall-VS-PFSense > > > On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 19:41:46 +0100, Dennis Karlsson > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I think you should implement UPnP, otherwise people will abandon >> m0n0wall. >> That's not good. >> When a project becomes too small it'll become >> unmaintained. >> > http://www.google.com/search?q=featuritis > >> If it doesn't need too big effort to add UPnP, just add it. Of course as >> > > >> disabled by default. >> >> OpenVPN as someone also mentioned would also be a nice feature. >> >> / Dennis >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >