RE: Future plans after 1.3?

"Jewell, Michael" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.firewalls.m0n0wall
Message-ID <5FEFE97AEC857F47802767A249C2F5321320363AA1@UMBEXMBX2.campus.umaryland.edu>
IPv6 is already in v1.3

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sai [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 7:13 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] Future plans after 1.3?
> 
> I would vote for IPV6
> I would vote against uPNP
> 
> sai
> 
> 2009/12/4 Robert <[email protected]>:
> > Now that m0n0wall is at version 1.3, I looked back at what where it
> started
> > and when it came out.  A lot has changed in six years.  Embedded
> processors
> > are more powerful now and 16Mb CF cards are practically non-existent.
>  We
> > all throw away the 32Mb cards that come with our cameras.  The original
> WRAP
> > and net4801 boards are discontinued, the ALIX boards are now the
> platform of
> > choice, and earlier this year AMD announced that it stopped development
> of
> > the Geode processor.
> >
> > I think the original goals of m0n0wall were to make it as small as
> possible,
> > run from RAM and work on embedded platforms.  But the definition of
> "small"
> > has changed.  Upgrading the scope of m0n0wall to platforms with 128MB
> RAM
> > and 32MB Flash would be a better target.  I still think it should focus
> as a
> > firewall which can be run entirely from RAM, as to not cross paths with
> > pfSense, Untangle or other firewalls which need more muscle and read-
> write
> > access to hard drives for caching, like squid.  But that being said,
> there
> > are a couple features which could be added without breaking that rule.
> >
> > For an entirely selfish reason, I'd like to see UPnP supported added.  I
> > don't use m0n0wall today for this very reason.  I'm forced to use
> pfSense
> > with all its bugs and inability to upgrade easily over the network.
>  Adding
> > UPnP as a feature would allow me to return.  OpenVPN and load-balancing
> > might also be possibilities.
> >
> > What other features would people like to see?
> >
> > -Robert
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
smime.p7s (application/x-pkcs7-signature, 3 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.