Re: H.323 woes...

Graham Allan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.firewalls.m0n0wall
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 01:05:42PM -0500, Lee Sharp wrote:
> Guy Boisvert wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >I have a hard time setting up mOnOwall to work with H.323.  We use a 
> >Polycom bridge in our DMZ and our users that have the Polycom client 
> >software can't use it.  They are on the LAN and mOnOwall does NAT.  I 
> >permit ports, i redirected the right one to one of our workstation, no 
> >luck.
> >
> >I read the H.323 is a "broken" protocol and that Cisco has a kind of 
> >proxy software that runs into their Pix to fix that.  Can mOnOwall be 
> >configured to work or is it impossible?
> 
> I got this Tuesday.  I did not have anything to add then.  I still do 
> not.  Perhaps more information would be helpful.

I haven't done this with m0n0wall, but H.323 is hard to pass through
firewalls. We used to pass it through a pf-based firewall (without NAT)
using gnugk (GNU gatekeeper), running on a machine inside the firewall.
With this you can define a port range just to forward to the gatekeeper
system.

Graham
--
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.