Re: gateway not working with vpn

Joe <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.firewalls.m0n0wall
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Jakob,

First of all, thanks for responding.

I was worried that I wasn't too clear.

Right now this is the working setup:

192.168.x.0/24<->  m0n0wall-1<-- {Internet} -->  monowall-2<->  192.168.y.0/24

Both sites can ping each other because of VPN.

I want to add the "gateway" machine so I can use NTOP and Squid as follows:

192.168.x.0/24<->  gateway<--(192.168.z.0/24)-->  m0n0wall-1<-- {Internet} -->  monowall-2<->  192.168.y.0/24

There. Maybe those diagrams are better.

When I added the "gateway", I got the following results:

 From any host on 192.168.x.0/24, I can ping any host on 192.168.y.0/24.
 From any host on 192.168.y.0/24, I cannot ping any host on 192.168.x.0/24.

Your message makes me wonder if I should have set it up like this:

192.168.x.0/24<->  gateway<--(192.168.x.0/24)-->  m0n0wall-1<-- {Internet} -->  monowall-2<->  192.168.y.0/24

What do you think? Does that look like it would work?
The "gateway" has two Ethernet ports.

Thanks,
Joe



On 05/07/2010 03:35 AM, Jakob Schwienbacher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> first of all i didn't understand the problem to 100%. Probably of my
> bad English =:)
>
> So on which host did you log on and try to ping site2? (192.168.x.0/24
> or 192.168.z.0/24)
> Traffic between LAN X and LAN Z is working?
> Is there a new Device between LAN X and LAN Z or is LAN X still
> connected to mono wall on another interface.
> Could you please describe the whole configuration of the site1 a bit clearly.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jakob
>
> On 4 May 2010 02:43, Joe<[email protected]>  wrote:
>    
>> Correction, where I wrote:
>>
>> I tried this unsuccessfully as follows:
>>
>> 192.168.x.0/24<->    [(192.168.*z*.0/24 = eth0) gateway (192.168.z.0/24 =
>> eth1)]<->    m0n0wall-1<-(Internet)->    monowall-2<->    192.168.y.0/24
>>
>>
>> I meant to write this:
>>
>> I tried this unsuccessfully as follows:
>>
>> 192.168.x.0/24<->    [(192.168.*x*.0/24 = eth0) gateway (192.168.z.0/24 =
>> eth1)]<->    m0n0wall-1<-(Internet)->    monowall-2<->    192.168.y.0/24
>>
>>
>> Can anybody point me to somewhere, where I might find answers to what I'm
>> trying to do?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Joe
>>
>>
>>
>> On 04/25/2010 12:44 PM, Joe wrote:
>>      
>>> Hi,
>>> I have what I believe is a routing problem.
>>>
>>> First of all, I have a site to site ipsec vpn up and running as follows:
>>>
>>> Site 1 Lan subnet: 192.168.x.0/24
>>> Site 2 Lan subnet: 192.168.y.0/24
>>>
>>> 192.168.x.0/24<->  m0n0wall-1<-(Internet)->  monowall-2<->  192.168.y.0/24
>>>
>>> It works.
>>> The vpn setups are to join the 192.168.x.0 network with the 192.168.y.0
>>> network and vice versa.
>>>
>>> Now, I want to introduce another gateway, so that I can monitor and
>>> control traffic.
>>> I tried this unsuccessfully as follows:
>>>
>>> 192.168.x.0/24<->  [(192.168.z.0/24 = eth0) gateway (192.168.z.0/24 =
>>> eth1)]<->  m0n0wall-1<-(Internet)->  monowall-2<->  192.168.y.0/24
>>>
>>> The internal Lan of monowall-1 was put on the 192.168.z.0 subnet and the
>>> monowall-2 ipsec vpn was changed to have the remote subnet be 192.168.z.0.
>>>
>>> A static route on monowall-1 was added to use the gateway eth1 IP
>>> (192.168.z.20) as a gateway to the Site1 Lan subnet traffic
>>> (192.168.x.0/24).
>>>
>>> Once configured, I could log onto a host at site1 and ping through to
>>> hosts at Site2.
>>> But from site2, I could not ping hosts on the site1 subnet.
>>>
>>> I could however ping the new gateway eth1 IP address (192.168.z.20) from
>>> Site2.
>>> I could also log onto the monowall-1 web interface and ping the Lan
>>> interface to any host of Site1.
>>>
>>> Can anybody suggest what is wrong?
>>>
>>> Note: I will be unable to test out any corrective action until some weeks
>>> in the future as I am dependent on work being done outside of normal
>>> business hours.
>>> The window for this is on some, but not all Sunday mornings.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>>      
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.