RE: Virtual LAN?

GD Incorporation <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.firewalls.m0n0wall
Organization GD Systems
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Guy and all m0n0wallist

Sorry for the top-post. Actually I am not ttrying to top-post anyone's
messages, just trying to reply your message. I hope I do this correctly now.
If not, please forgive me for I am not too experienced in forum manners.

By the way, what I wanted to achive is that I have 1 small 8 ports switch
and 1 wireless access point with 4-ports extended switch. I need to be able
to give full access to people connected to the wireless AP/Switch and block
the internet access for people connected to the regular 8-ports switch.

I was told to create 2 separate zone using VLAN. M0n0wall has that VLAN
feature and I never used it. Reading all the replies from the other guys, it
seemed I need VLAN supported Switches in order to enable the VLAN function.

However, I still want to confirm few things, can anyone helped me:
1. If I use 2 switches, do I still need to use VLAN Supported switches?
Based on the pictures you sent me it seemed I do :) Please confirm me on
this.
2. If I use 2 switches, would this be the correct structure? (I only have 2
LAN CARDS, one for WAN, and one for LAN). At the bottom picture, should I
connect the switch 1 to switch 2 by LAN?

Please help?
   Internet 
      |
      |
  ADSL Modem
      |
      |
 m0n0wall WAN - m0n0wall LAN --> switch 1 --> open users
                                   |
                                   --> switch 2 --> restricted users
 

3. If the structure above is correct, then I would need only 1 Switch to
support VLAN (Switch 1). Is this correct?

Thank you so much.
Rendra

-----Original Message-----
From: Guy Boisvert [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 3:47 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] Virtual LAN?

Le 2010-11-12 15:11, Guy Boisvert a écrit :
> [Stuff deleted...]
> We use VLANs to separate broadcast domains (a switch already separate 
> collision domains).  You could see vlans as separate dumb switches 
> (that doesn't support VLANs).  2 VLANs on 1 managed switch would be 
> equivalent to 2 physical dumb switch.  VLANs are defined at layer 2 of 
> the OSI model.
>
> [Stuff deleted...]

Replying to myself, i forgot to point out than in applications where
security is very important, separate switches are safer than 1 swith with
VLANs.  That's because switches can be fooled into forwarding frames between
VLANs by using advanced hack technique (like VLAN hopping).

http://www.itsyourip.com/Security/vlan-hopping-layer-2-security-exploit-bypa
ss-layer-3-security/


--
Guy Boisvert, ing.
IngTegration inc.
http://www.ingtegration.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.